01 – When Hotel Spa Treatment Room Utilization Falls and Labor Cost Does Not
The spa had 8 treatment rooms and ran an average utilization rate of 71% across the prior year. In the current year, a combination of lower hotel occupancy...
Get started
The wellness director managed both the spa and the fitness center. Staff moved between functions depending on demand. A fitness attendant covered the spa reception desk during slow fitness periods. A spa coordinator managed fitness class bookings when the fitness desk was unmanned. A massage therapist with personal training certification occasionally covered fitness floor supervision. None of those crossovers were tracked. The spa labor report showed total spa hours. The fitness labor report showed total fitness hours. The hours that belonged to both belonged to neither in any systematic way.
Hotel spa and fitness operations frequently share staff, supervision, and operational responsibility without any financial visibility into where the labor is actually going. The cost of that sharing is absorbed by both departments in ways that make neither department’s financial picture accurate.
When staff are shared between spa and fitness functions without tracking which department their hours serve, both departments carry an inaccurate labor cost. The spa appears to have more labor than it is actually deploying on spa functions. The fitness center appears to have more labor than it is actually deploying on fitness functions. Neither department’s labor-to-revenue ratio reflects the true cost of the work each department is actually generating. The aggregate hotel labor cost is correct. The departmental attribution is not.
The financial consequence of inaccurate departmental attribution is that decisions made on the basis of those ratios are made on flawed information. If the spa labor-to-revenue ratio appears elevated because fitness staff hours are coded to the spa, a decision to reduce spa labor may eliminate hours that are actually serving the fitness function. If the fitness labor cost appears low because spa staff hours are absorbing fitness coverage, the fitness center’s true cost of operation is understated and its contribution to hotel margin is overstated.
“Both departments looked like they had cost problems when we reviewed them separately. When we tracked where the staff were actually working, both cost structures made sense. The problem was the coding, not the staffing.”
We help hotels control labor costs by connecting staffing, productivity, forecasting, budgets, and department-level workforce decisions to changing property demand while protecting service quality.
Learn MoreA wellness director managing both spa and fitness is splitting their supervisory time across 2 cost centers. How that time is allocated in the hotel’s labor cost system determines which department carries the supervisory overhead. In many hotels, the wellness director’s cost sits entirely in the spa budget because the spa is the primary function. The fitness center benefits from that supervision without carrying any of its cost. The spa’s supervisory cost appears elevated. The fitness center’s appears lean. Neither is accurate.
Building an accurate financial picture of both spa and fitness requires tracking staff hours by function rather than by department code, allocating shared supervisory cost across the functions being supervised, and connecting each department’s true labor cost to its own revenue and utilization metrics. That tracking is more operationally demanding than standard labor coding. It is the only way to make decisions about staffing levels, service scope, and departmental investment on the basis of accurate financial data rather than on allocation artifacts. This is the cross-functional labor attribution that hotel wellness department labor cost accuracy requires when 2 functions share staff, supervision, and operational responsibility under a single management structure.
“We’d been making decisions about the spa and fitness budgets based on numbers that reflected how we coded things, not how the work was actually distributed. The real cost structure of both departments looked different once we tracked it properly.”
A hotel spa and fitness center that share staff without tracking where those hours go are operating 2 financial P&Ls built on allocations rather than on the actual cost of the work each function performs. Hotels that build the tracking to separate spa hours from fitness hours, attribute shared supervision across both functions, and connect each department’s labor to its own revenue find that the financial picture of both departments changes. The decisions those accurate pictures support, about pricing, staffing levels, service scope, and capital investment in each function, are materially different from the decisions that inaccurate P&Ls produce.
This Article Is Part of a Larger Series
The spa had 8 treatment rooms and ran an average utilization rate of 71% across the prior year. In the current year, a combination of lower hotel occupancy...
Get started
The spa director scheduled 6 therapists for Saturday based on the prior 4 Saturdays averaging 82% treatment room utilization. This Saturday ran at 61% beca...
Get started