The hotel ran 2 security officers overnight, 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM, every night of the year. The overnight shift had been staffed at that level since the hotel opened. The overnight incident log showed an average of 1.4 documented security events per week during overnight hours across the prior year. Those events included noise complaints, locked-out guests, and 1 minor property incident. The 2-officer overnight shift was generating 14 officer hours per night against an average security event volume that required approximately 90 minutes of total response time per week. The remaining overnight officer hours were essentially patrol and standby coverage.
Hotel overnight security coverage is set at a level that reflects a combination of minimum coverage requirements, risk assessment, and convention. When that level has not been formally reviewed against the hotel’s actual overnight incident history, the coverage may significantly exceed what the risk profile requires.
Hotel overnight security staffing is typically set at opening based on the hotel’s size, location, market, and brand standard. That initial staffing decision may have been thoroughly risk-assessed or it may have been made on convention, matching what similar hotels in the market run, or on brand standard compliance, meeting the flag’s minimum overnight security requirement. Once set, the overnight security staffing level rarely receives the formal risk reassessment it would need to justify either an increase or a reduction.
A hotel in a low-incident market, with a predominantly business traveler guest mix, minimal overnight event programming, and a documented overnight incident rate of 1.4 events per week, has a risk profile that should inform its overnight security staffing. The 2-officer overnight structure may be exactly right for that profile. It may also be above what the risk assessment would support if the assessment were conducted formally and connected to the staffing decision.
“We’d run 2 officers overnight since the hotel opened. We’d never formally connected the overnight staffing level to the overnight incident history. When we looked at the incident log against the coverage, the conversation we needed to have became obvious.”
We help hotels control labor costs by connecting staffing, productivity, forecasting, budgets, and department-level workforce decisions to changing property demand while protecting service quality.
Learn MoreA formal overnight security risk assessment for a hotel reviews the documented overnight incident history by type and frequency, the physical access and vulnerability profile of the hotel during overnight hours, the guest mix and behavior patterns that the hotel’s occupancy generates overnight, and any local crime environment factors that affect the hotel’s overnight risk profile. The result of that assessment is a staffing recommendation that reflects the hotel’s actual overnight risk rather than the convention or brand standard that may have governed the original staffing decision.
That assessment may confirm that 2 officers is the right overnight coverage level. It may indicate that 1 officer with specific patrol protocols and response procedures is sufficient for the hotel’s documented overnight risk profile. It may indicate that the 2-officer structure is appropriate but that both officers need not be on patrol simultaneously and that one can be assigned to surveillance monitoring during lower-activity overnight windows. Each of those findings produces a financially meaningful outcome that the current staffing convention cannot produce because it was never connected to the risk assessment that would justify or challenge it.
Connecting overnight security staffing to a documented risk assessment produces a coverage level that can be defended to ownership, insurers, and any other party with a legitimate interest in understanding how the hotel has calibrated its overnight security investment. It also produces a coverage level that can be adjusted if the risk profile changes, which is the financial flexibility that convention-based staffing cannot provide. This is the risk-to-coverage calibration that hotel overnight security cost and risk profile alignment requires to move beyond convention into financially defensible security management.
“The formal risk assessment confirmed that 2 officers was appropriate for our overnight profile. The value wasn’t in finding a way to reduce coverage. It was in being able to say with confidence why the coverage we were running was the right level.”
A hotel overnight security coverage level that has never been formally connected to a documented risk assessment is a convention, not a security decision. The cost of that coverage is real. Whether it is the right cost for the hotel’s actual overnight risk profile is a question that has never been formally asked. Hotels that ask it, conduct the assessment, and connect the result to the staffing decision produce overnight security coverage that is both operationally justified and financially defensible. Hotels that do not are spending on convention and hoping the convention is right.
This Article Is Part of a Larger Series
Access the complete Hotel Labor Series
The security department budget grew 14% over 2 years. No new positions had been formally approved. The growth had accumulated through shift extensions, rec...
Get started
The hotel ran a 24-hour security operation with 3 officers on the day shift, 2 on the evening shift, and 2 on the overnight shift. The shift structure had ...
Get started